BigWinBoard: power in the hands of players
BigWinBoard: power in the hands of players
An online slots review publication has published an article calling for the punishment of allslotsonline.casino unanswered vendors who use streamers to market their games.
For years, the authors claim, the online casino industry has been completely unregulated by any jurisdiction. Self-regulation by greed-driven providers and gambling zone holders was not considered at all. At this stage, the gambling industry is heavily regulated, which is detrimental to both the entrepreneurs and the clientele.
In Britain, as in a number of other European sectors of the gambling industry, there are many restrictions and guidelines: for example, highly invasive inspections take place and very strict marketing regulations are being promoted. But on the streaming services on Twitch and Youtube, the modern casino-entertainment segment seems like the wild west: all regulation is absent. Twitch is full of young people and underage teenagers - 41% of the audience is aged 16-24. Gambling hobbies are heavily promoted here, of course there is a need for accountability and restrictions. Users are demanding an end to such marketing on these platforms: this spread of gambling activity is unacceptable," the users wrote.
The authors of the article are not advocating an end to app streaming and other new casinos uk related leisure activities. First of all, the publication is interested in freedom of choice and importance of raising the issue: such approach is detrimental to casino community, as it raises the degree of social tension.
Secondly, they are very concerned about dextop reality: They equate it to Instagram Influencers with tricked-out bot followers. For the most part, they admit that casino streaming is a big spectacle with sponsorship money and fake amounts of money that cannot be withdrawn. Of course, there are some adequate streamers in the industry who strive for transparency, but the vast majority are crooks. The most unscrupulous can be distinguished by the "ridiculously large" bitcoin casino accounts.
The publication attributes the phenomenon to the fact that any illegal casino fears the intervention of the regulatory commission. That's why the operator pays a tidy sum for the air - to get attention quickly, collect revenue and come up with a new product, pulling off the scheme all over again.
The authors tried to bring these arguments to the developers, but they answered that they cannot forbid the streamers to play our games. A false picture emerges thanks to this kind of "paid-for" streaming about the entire gambling industry. Through sponsorship credit and bonuses, streamers are sending the idea that if you play a certain operator's games, there are bound to be winnings. This should not be the case in gambling, and penalties should be issued for such promotions.
Some users are outraged that players are looked upon as idiots who are very easy to manipulate. Most commentators agree with the facts about the need for transparency in any marketing of a game product.
Recall that one example of such behaviour in gambling, Pragmatic Play studio, listened to the publication and removed all promotional content of dubious streaming.
