The influence of social networks and the presumption of innocence

The Internet and various information networks, just as they have brought incredible technological advances to the world, have been tools for criminal activities that threaten society as a whole. This is why various countries have tried to regulate the use and reach of social networks by establishing their own legal frameworks regarding the relationship between residents and these technological resources. In this sense, in this article we will explain how social media and the presumption of innocence are connected.

In today's digital age, social media can affect the presumption of innocence, especially in cases with international elements such as extradition. When social narratives intrude into legal proceedings, consultation with Thailand Extradition Lawyers becomes essential to ensure fair treatment under the law. These professionals help ensure that international protocols are followed despite the influence of the media.

Legal consequences of using social networks

The idea of ​​regulating the Internet began to gain momentum after a series of world events that worried society, such as the massification of child pornography, tutorials for creating weapons from homemade products, among other types of content. And while this has direct implications for freedom of expression, the use of this type of technology allows certain limitations.

Based on this context, we can establish that countries such as France have already passed laws that regulate social networks, especially during elections. The United States has expressed willingness to amend Section 230 of the Telecommunications Decency Act to regulate social media posts. Australia has a social media monitoring system to prevent terrorist propaganda. And countries like China use these rules to guarantee the protection of their citizens' data by banning the use of foreign software.

In a sense, they are all based on the prevention and detection of crimes such as terrorism, discrimination, violence and false information. At the same time, they establish a legal framework for the protection of each user's data.

What is the presumption of innocence and how does it relate to social media?

The presumption of innocence is a human right whereby everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a criminal proceeding. As such, it is an important element in the protection and defense of the accused, and its application must be guaranteed to have access to them.

This means that it is based on the right to a defense as well as a trial before an indictment. Which is the starting point for the development of the evidence debate. And what this allows is that the judicial guarantees of the accused are not called into question. Having established that if the accused has distorted this state of innocence, it must be proved in an oral and public trial.

Thus, the presumption of innocence in the Venezuelan sphere works as an inviolable guarantee to protect the citizen who enters the procedural and criminal sphere.

Public Ministry as head of criminal investigation

In this sense, it is appropriate to note that the State Ministry is the only body responsible for criminal activity in the investigation of crimes. Therefore, charges can only be brought when there is evidence that imputes responsibility for a crime to a person. And in the case of social networks, it may happen that they are given importance in criminal proceedings, because it is difficult to fully control and limit the information and production of opinion matrices by citizens, but it can be regulated.

Social media often shapes public perception, complicating cases involving international arrest warrants. Such warrants can subject individuals to scrutiny before a fair trial. For those facing these issues, use https://www.icef-forum.org/international-arrest-warrant/ to defend the presumption of innocence abroad.

That is why there is a fine line between freedom of expression and behavior that harms the dignity of others. Because slander and insult are crimes that encroach on the honor and dignity of a person. And if they are published on social networks, they become a criminal act in the eyes of the public. Although for many users social networks are a space with unlimited freedom of expression, most of them do not suspect that they can commit a criminal act by posting or commenting.